Product teams re-litigate the same roadmap calls because the reasoning never made it out of the meeting.

Why this keeps happening

Roadmap docs and tickets are optimized for "what's the plan," not "why this plan over the others." Prioritization debates happen live — in a meeting, a Slack thread, a doc comment — and the losing arguments (and the reasons they lost) usually don't get written down anywhere at all. Three months later, the same debate resurfaces, nobody remembers it already happened, and the team spends another hour re-deriving a conclusion it already reached.

The decisions that matter most for a product team

How Cadenzova Decisions helps

Capture a prioritization call the moment it's made — typed in a sentence, recorded as a voice note right after the meeting, or imported as a screenshot of the thread where it actually happened. Second Sight structures it into the reason, the alternatives you weighed, the approach you chose, and what you expected to happen. When a related or contradicting decision gets captured later, it's flagged automatically instead of silently sitting in a different doc. And when someone asks "why did we prioritize X over Y," Ask answers it — grounded only in decisions your team actually recorded, not a guess.

Who this isn't for

If your team makes very few, very slow decisions, or already has rigorous written decision docs (with rationale, alternatives, and revisit dates) that people actually read later, a dedicated decision memory may add less than it would for a fast-moving team drowning in Slack threads and stale docs.